Legal Opinion
Pencheff v. Adams
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1983No. 82-586PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.
The record clearly shows that appellees violated the provisions of R.C. 1707.44(C)(1)2 in the sale of unregistered securities to appellant. Consequently, the sole issue before this court is whether the violation materially affected the protection contemplated by the violated provision.3
This very issue (sale of unregistered securities) was addressed and resolved by this court in Bronaugh v. R. & E. Dredging Co. (1968), 16 Ohio St. 2d 35 [45 O.O.2d 321], At the outset, we decided that a determination of this issue was a question of law that could properly be resolved by this court. Id. at 40.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bronaugh v. R. & E. Dredging Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bell v. Le-Ge, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
- McGraw v. Liberty Airlines, Inc. (In Re Bell & Beckwith)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
- Frost v. Civiello (In Re Civiello)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,964 James E. Mark v. Fsc Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Boland v. HammondOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.