Legal Opinion

Boland v. Hammond

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 2001No. Case No. 00CA2722PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

The defendant-appellant, Donald Hammond, appeals an order of the Scioto Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffsappellees.

This is a securities investment case brought under the Ohio Securities Act, R.C. 1707.01 et seq. The events giving rise to the cause of action date back to 1992 when Donald Hammond, a minister in Portsmouth, Ohio, was introduced to Wendell Rogers, a fellow minister in Louisiana. Rogers was also the president of an investment company, Sunbelt Development Company (“Sunbelt”). A friendship developed between the two, and Hammond…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lorain National Bank v. Saratoga ApartmentsOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Bronaugh v. R. & E. Dredging Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State ex rel. Mayes v. HolmanOhio Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc., Investment LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  3. Boyd v. Kingdom Trust Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Bitounis v. Interactive Brokers, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Bristow v. MourotCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API