Legal Opinion

Bell v. Le-Ge, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1985No. 48497PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, J.

The buyers of unregistered corporate stock brought this action against the two issuing corporations and their corporate officers and directors to rescind the purchase. The corporation and its officials counterclaimed that the purchasers later tortiously interfered with the officials' efforts to sell one of the two companies to another purchaser. Following a bench trial, the trial court dismissed the claim and the counterclaim. Both sides appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the counterclaim for plaintiffs’ allegedly tortious interference with the defendants’ business relations.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Daggett v. GessamanOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Henry v. Central National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Reichman v. DrakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Pearse v. McDonald's System of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Bronaugh v. R. & E. Dredging Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stiles v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Dorricott v. Fairhill Center for AgingDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
  3. Bennco Liquidating Co. v. Ameritrust Co. National Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. McGraw v. Liberty Airlines, Inc. (In Re Bell & Beckwith)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
  5. Bill Call Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API