Legal Opinion

Stanwood v. Multnomah County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 21, 1995No. 9401-00000; CA A83159PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a fee waiver or deferral. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff, a federal prisoner, filed a summons and complaint against Multnomah County in Multnomah County Circuit Court. The court returned his pleadings for failure to pay the $ 118 filing fee. Plaintiff then submitted a motion for a waiver or deferral of the fee, which included an affidavit attesting to his inability to pay. The motion was denied 2 and plaintiff appeals.

We must first address whether the order denying the fee waiver is appealable, as appellate jurisdiction is limited and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waybrant v. BernsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Samuels v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. STATE, DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Baker v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Blaisdell v. Department of Public SafetyHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Smith v. Dept. of Corrections (A170818)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Curtis v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Hejazi v. GiffordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API