Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Lampert

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 2000No. M9906051; CA A106848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Plaintiff seeks review of an order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis in a civil action. We review the trial court’s decision for abuse of discretion, Stanwood v. Multnomah County, 135 Or App 58, 898 P2d 196 (1995), and reverse.

A preliminary question presented in this case is whether there exists a trial court record sufficient to allow appellate review of the issue presented. The trial court record, as forwarded by the trial court to this court, consists solely of a copy of plaintiffs notice of appeal filed on June 23, 1999, in the trial court, to which is attached a copy of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mueller v. BenningOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Stanwood v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Burgess v. HolstedtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blaisdell v. Department of Public SafetyHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Neal v. NealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  3. Voth v. Snake River Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Neal v. NealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. Williams v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API