Legal Opinion

King v. F. B. Grevemberg & Son, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1930No. 11,516; No. 11,517PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

These two cases present the same issue and were consolidated for the purpose of decision.

Plaintiffs, Laight and King, entered suits against the defendants, in solido, for the sum of $1,400.25 and the sum of $552.25, respectively, representing the balance of deposits which were made by plaintiffs with the defendant, F. B. Grevemberg & Son, Inc., for the purchase of real estate. The suits are against a real estate broker and the surety which signed the real estate broker’s bond.

There was judgment in favor of plaintiffs for the amounts claimed, and only the surety company has appealed.

The record…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zerlin v. Louisiana Real Estate BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Texas Co. v. MattisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Brodtmann v. CooperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zeller v. ChettaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Boisseau v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Heine v. DicksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Langley v. RiethLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API