Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Double v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1992No. 91-1470PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Former Ohio Adm.Code 4121:l-5-01(A) provided:

“The specific requirements of this code * * * apply to all workshops and factories subject to the Workers’ Compensation Act (4123.01 to 4123.99 R.C.). * * * ” (Emphasis added.)

Appellant does not contend that Leadbetter is a “factory” as contemplated by Ohio Adm.Code Chapter 4121:1-5. She does, however, contest the appellate ruling that Leadbetter is not a “workshop.”

“Workshop” has not been defined administratively, statutorily or judicially by this court. The term, however, was interpreted by the appellate court below, citing State ex rel. Koch v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Frank Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cassens Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
  2. State ex rel. Parks v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Waugh v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Devore Roofing & Painting v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Cassens Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API