Legal Opinion
State v. Mosher
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided July 30, 1998No. 97-3535-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.
The issue on this appeal is whether Everett W. Mosher was subject to custodial questioning by police when he made statements admitting sexual contact with a person under sixteen. The trial court ruled he was not and, therefore, was not entitled to the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and the statements were admissible. After this ruling, Mosher entered no contest pleas to two charges of violating § 948.02(2), Stats., sexual contact with a person under sixteen. Mosher appeals the judgment of conviction entered on those two charges and the trial court's order…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Leonard David GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- City of College Place v. StaudenmaierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- City of College Place v. StaudenmaierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. Timothy E. DobbsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.