Legal Opinion

People v. 1991 Dodge Ram Charger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 7, 1993No. 2-92-0721PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE INGLIS

delivered the opinion of the court:

The trial court ordered the forfeiture of a vehicle owned jointly by claimants Richard and David Dietterich pursuant to section 505(a)(3) of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act (Controlled Substances Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 56½, par. 1505(a)(3) (now 720 ILCS 570/ 505(a)(3) (West 1992))). On appeal from the trial court’s order, claimants argue that they were not responsible for, nor did they acquiesce in, the use of their vehicle to facilitate drug activity.

On February 5, 1992, the State filed a complaint for the forfeiture…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Collins v. Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hernon v. E.W. Corrigan Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Williams v. Illinois State Scholarship CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. 1946 Buick, Vin 34423520Illinois Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Hartrich v. 2010 Harley-DavidsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People Ex Rel. Waller v. Seeburg Slot MacHinesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. People v. One 1982 Maroon Ford MustangAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. The PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD O. WADE, Defendant-AppellantAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API