Tristan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
The appellant was indicted for the offense of burglary with intent to commit theft. A prior conviction in a State court for the same offense and a prior conviction in a Federal court for a narcotics offense were alleged for enhancement under Art. 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. The jury-found that appellant was guilty of the offense charged and found that the enhancement allegations were true. The mandatory sentence of imprisonment for life was assessed.
Appellant’s first two grounds of error urge that the prior federal conviction was improperly used for enhancement because: (a)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Tatum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Chaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Leal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Bermudez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Pearson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Ex Parte RamirezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.