Ex Parte Ramirez
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHILLIPS, Judge.
This is a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus relief pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P.
Appellant has filed an application for ha-beas corpus relief alleging that the “factual documentary evidence of material importance at the punishment phase of his trial was actively suppressed by the prosecution and the false picture of the facts presented constituted perjured testimony.” Appellant argues that the “prosecution knew or should have known that it was misrepresenting documentary facts.” Appellant’s allegations and his Memorandum of Law and Points of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ex Parte EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Ex Parte AcostaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Briddle v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Ex Parte BlumeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.