Legal Opinion
Carter v. Tucker
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 1, 2003No. 03-5021PublishedCited by 213 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Keith Carter, a Tennessee prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Carter sued Tennessee Department of Correction (“TDOC”) Liaison Penny Tucker and Disciplinary Board Chairperson Shawny Scott. He alleged that Scott violated his right to due process in the manner in which she conducted his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Darryl McGore v. Gene L. Wrigglesworth, Chief Sheriff Richard Chinelli, Administrator Ingham County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by213 opinions
- Catanzaro v. HarryDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
- (PC) Montecastro v. NewsomeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Adams 268663 v. Unknown Party 1District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
- Adams v. BakerDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Adams v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.