Legal Opinion

(PC) Montecastro v. Newsome

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 25, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01065Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HENDRIX M. MONTECASTRO, No. 1:19-cv-01065-NONE-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 13 v. RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE 14 NEWSOME, et al., CLAIM FOR RELIEF 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 1) 16 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 19 Plaintiff Hendrix M. Montecastro (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 20 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 I. Procedural Background 22 This action was originally filed…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API