Legal Opinion

Henningsen Produce Co. v. American Railway Express Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 19, 1922No. 22,842PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover for merchandise lost by the defendant express company in transit. There was judgment for the plaintiff for the amount of the loss. The defendant appeals.

■ 1. The facts are not in dispute. On August 29, 1918, the plaintiff delivered to the defendant at Butte, Montana, six cubes of butter for transportation to Portland, Oregon. It was not delivered to the consignee. The cause of the loss is not shown. The Cummins Amendment of March 4, 1915, 38 St. 1196, c. 176, to the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, relative to bills of lading, liability of carrier, etc.,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. McCaull-Dinsmore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. McCune v. GoodwillieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Bronstein v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  5. Erie Railroad v. ShuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Van PeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Graml v. GramlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Olson v. EvertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Davis v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  5. Allen v. Davis, Dir. Gen'lSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API