Legal Opinion

Lee v. Lee

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2007No. 20060321PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Bruce Lee appeals the trial court’s amended judgment, a second amended judgment, corrected second amended judgment, and order on motions modifying his spousal support obligation. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Susan Lee and Bruce Lee separated in 2001 after twenty-one years of marriage. In January 2002, the parties signed a stipulation that was incorporated into a divorce judgment. The judgment granted Bruce Lee primary physical custody of the parties’ minor child and ordered him to pay spousal support of $250 per month for twenty-four months from January 15, 2002. Under the judgment,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ruff v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Riverwood Commercial Park, L.L.C. v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Sack v. SackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Amsbaugh v. AmsbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Investors Title Insurance Co. v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Doepke v. DoepkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Varty v. VartyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Ellis v. North Dakota State UniversityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. CahoonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API