Legal Opinion
United States v. Goehl
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 6, 1984No. 83 CR 956PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Gary Goehl has moved under Fed.R. Crim.P. (“Rule”) 35 for reduction of the sentence imposed by this Court July 26, 1984 pursuant to a plea agreement Goehl had previously entered into with the United States. For the reasons briefly stated in this memorandum opinion and order, the motion is denied.
At the outset a comment is in order as to the timing of the motion. It was filed November 21, 118 days after imposition of sentence. That meant of course the United States had no opportunity to prepare even a skeletal response until more than 120 days…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Stojilko KajevicCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. William Charles MooneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. James InendinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. DunnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HoldawayIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
- United States v. GodfreyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1987
- State v. PersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- McBride v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. PersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007