Legal Opinion
State v. Holdaway
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided August 1, 1997No. 23050PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
In this case we address the circumstances under which a defendant who has received the sentence to which he stipulated in a plea agreement may justifiably seek reduction of that sentence by a post-judgment motion under Idaho Criminal Rule 35.
Gary Boyd Holdaway was charged with possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) with intent to deliver, a violation of I.C. § 37-2732(a)(l)(A). Holdaway entered into a written plea agreement by which the State agreed to amend the charge to a lesser offense, possession of a controlled substance, I.C. § 37-2732(e)(l). The State…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RutherfordIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. RutherfordIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- United States v. Ronald H. SemlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- State v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WadeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FuhrimanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. PersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Andrew TaylorIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. NeilanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- McBride v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.