Schultz v. Keene Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
Plaintiff John Schultz claims to be suffering from asbestosis. He initiated this diversity action against a host of asbestos sellers, manufacturers, and distributors. Some of these defendants have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, the court grants summary judgment in favor of defendants AC & S, Inc., Fibreboard Corporation, and Pittsburgh Corning Corporation. With respect to defendant Owens-Illinois, Inc., summary judgment is entered only on Count I of plaintiffs’ complaint. The motion for summary judgment of defendants Armstrong World…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Nolan v. Johns-Manville AsbestosIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Benjamin H. Blackston, Wilmer L. Ring, John N. Turner, James N. Tanksley and Foster G. Hickox v. Shook and Fletcher Insulation Co., Ac & S, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Mega v. Holy Cross HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Horton v. Harwick Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- Tragarz v. Keene Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Beeman v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation FundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Johnson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.