McMillan v. Davis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
We believe the superior court correctly interpreted the will of Mary D. Hodges. Under the contested provision Luna Davis Newsome was to receive a one-half undivided interest in the property. She did not survive the testatrix and this legacy lapsed. The lapse was not saved by G.S. 31-42(a) because Luna Davis Newsome’s heirs would not have taken under the Intestate Succession Act had there been no will. Stevenson v. Trust Co., 202 N.C. 92, 161 S.E. 728 (1932).
Simon Peter Davis survived the testatrix and he received a remainder interest after the life estate of Walter Hodges, Jr. “An…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Charlotte Park & Recreation Commission v. BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Stevenson v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- Canoy v. CanoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999