Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1992No. 74120PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.

The issues presented by the defendant in this post-divorce modification and contempt proceeding are these: Whether the trial judge erred when he (1) found that the plaintiff was not guilty of indirect contempt of court; (2) failed to pass on the defendant’s request to reduce unpaid medical expenses to judgment; and (3) modified the child support in the manner he did.

We hold that he did and vacate his order.

I

The operative facts are these. Plaintiff Stacie Smith and defendant Robert Smith were granted a divorce September 4, 1987.1 The woman was awarded custody of their two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rees v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Knell v. BurnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Jackson v. General Finance CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Barnhart v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  5. Ingram v. DunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Department of Human Services ex rel. Jones v. BaggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. STATE, EX REL. DHS v. BaggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API