Smith v. Smith
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.
The issues presented by the defendant in this post-divorce modification and contempt proceeding are these: Whether the trial judge erred when he (1) found that the plaintiff was not guilty of indirect contempt of court; (2) failed to pass on the defendant’s request to reduce unpaid medical expenses to judgment; and (3) modified the child support in the manner he did.
We hold that he did and vacate his order.
I
The operative facts are these. Plaintiff Stacie Smith and defendant Robert Smith were granted a divorce September 4, 1987.1 The woman was awarded custody of their two…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rees v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Knell v. BurnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Jackson v. General Finance CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Barnhart v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Ingram v. DunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services ex rel. Jones v. BaggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- STATE, EX REL. DHS v. BaggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000