Legal Opinion

Elder v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 27, 1970No. 44654PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Evans, Judge.

The purpose of the summary judgment is not to by-pass a jury trial but to eliminate the necessity therefor when there is no genuine issue of fact, and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Holland v. Sanfax Corp., 106 Ga. App. 1 (126 SE2d 442); Caldwell v. Gregory, 120 Ga. App. 536 (171 SE2d 671); Connors v. City Council of Augusta, 120 Ga. App. 499 (171 SE2d 578). It enables the trial judge to filter out the sham issues in order to avoid needless and time-consuming litigation. But any doubt as to the existence of an issue is resolved against the movant.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Wade v. DrinkardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Rentz v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Smith v. PageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  5. Phœnix Insurance v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coolik v. HawkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Trulove v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Harris v. HardmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Mitchell v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Carter v. MadrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API