Legal Opinion

Cardinal of Adrian, Inc. v. Peerless Wood Products, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 15, 1973No. Civ. A. 29897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RALPH M. FREEMAN, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement action in which plaintiff claims that defendants are infringing Claims 1-4 of U. S. Patent No. 3,205,532 entitled “Latchless Door Hinge” issued on September 14, 1965, and Claims 2-5 of U. S. Patent No. 3,212,124 entitled “Hinge for Latch-less Door”, issued on October 14, 1965. The patents involve latchless, self-closing hinges, now widely used on kitchen cabinets in place of the previously used conventional hinge and separate friction or magnetic latch.

Plaintiff, Cardinal of Adrian, Inc., is a Michigan corporation. It is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. Muncie Gear Works, Inc. v. Outboard, Marine & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Monsanto Company v. Rohm & Haas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  2. Cardinal of Adrian, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Peerless Wood Products, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
  4. Taussig v. Jack & Jill One Hour Cleaners, No. 12, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
  5. Hanes Corp. v. MillardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API