Matter of Peteet.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The respondent in this ease, Jerry Lee Peteet, has been charged with failing to hold property of clients or third persons separate from his own property, 1 knowingly making false statements of material fact in connection with a disciplinary matter, 2 failing to disclose a fact necessary to correct a misapprehension known to have arisen in connection with a disciplinary matter, 3 and engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation. 4 In accordance with the provisions set forth in Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, a hearing officer was…
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re CherryIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Matter of JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1998