Legal Opinion

In Re Cherry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1999No. 48S00-9612-DI-745PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

Hugh Erskine Cherry’s client, incarcerated for committing the crimes of robbery and confinement, informed his lawyer that he wished to pursue post-conviction remedies promptly upon conclusion of appeals of his convictions. Respondent Cherry, with no legitimate basis for doing so, then delayed for five and one-half years after conclusion of the appeals process before filing a petition for post-conviction relief for that client. For that, we conclude today that he should be suspended from the practice of law.

This case comes before us now upon the duly-appointed hearing…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of KernIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Matter of GrotrianIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Matter of CherryIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Matter of AntcliffIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Matter of CushingIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In Re TsoutsourisIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API