Legal Opinion
Ginsberg v. Granados
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 2009No. 07-CV-519PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Senior Judge:
Pamela Ginsberg appeals the trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees to appel-lees, Vilma Granados and her counsel, Paul Kiyonaga, Esq., Debra Soltis, Esq., and Kiyonaga & Soltis, P.C., made after the dismissal of a civil complaint filed against them on behalf of Ginsberg. The trial court held that the complaint claiming ap-pellees acted negligently by acquiring and discussing Ginsberg’s publicly available criminal record was “made without color, in bad faith, and for the purpose of harassing counsel.” Ginsberg argues on appeal that (1) there was insufficient evidence to…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Braley v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Wrenn v. GouldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wood v. NeumanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Hundley v. JohnstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Cave v. ScheulovDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Bell v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.