Cave v. Scheulov
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Senior Judge:
Appellant Christine Cave challenges the trial court’s denial of her request for attorney’s fees after a successful petition for a civil protection order (CPO) against her husband, appellee Daniel Scheulov. Cave asserts that the trial court applied the incorrect standard, requiring that she prove the litigation was “oppressive or burdensome” as a “condition precedent to awarding counsel fees.” We agree with Cave that no “condition precedent” factors must be resolved in her favor before the court considers all other relevant factors in determining whether to award…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Synanon Foundation, Inc. v. BernsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Peart v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Natalie Khawam v. Grayson P. WolfeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- C.C. v. G.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024