Reid v. Clendenning
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 27, Oct. T., 1899, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., on bill in * equity. Bill in equity for an injunction and for a receiver. The facts appear by the opinion of Slagle, P. J., which was as follows: EINDINGS OE EACT.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 27, Oct. T., 1899, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., on bill in * equity. Bill in equity for an injunction and for a receiver. The facts appear by the opinion of Slagle, P. J., which was as follows: EINDINGS OE EACT. The original bill in this case was filed September 20, 1890, by T. Walter Day, trustee of George B. Hay and Elizabeth Hay, versus J. Sharp McDonald, C. J. Hummell, Anna B. McDonald, John R. Harbison, J. M. Guffey and The Southwest Pennsylvania Pipe Line Company. On the same day a motion for a receiver and preliminary injunction was made, which…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We find no error in this record that requires either reversal or modification of the decree from which this appeal was taken. The findings of fact were fully warranted by the pleadings and evidence, and the conclusions drawn therefrom are substantially correct. All that need be said in support of the decree will be found in the clear and satisfactory opinion of the learned trial judge, and on it the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Kelley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Flanders v. Ford City Borough CouncilCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Leahey v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Estate of J. Morton IvisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Shaffer EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.