Legal Opinion

Kelley's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1929No. Appeal, 208PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Appellant’s basic contention is that, although we know the law of New Jersey has developed along somewhat divergent lines, and is, in certain respects, essentially different from that of our own State, we must nevertheless presume, because of the absence of proof to the contrary, that there is a statute in New Jersey substantially the same as our Act of June 7, 1919, P. L. 412, which provides a limitation of one year for the lien of decedent’s debts, as against his realty, unless an action has been brought to recover them within this period. It is not necessary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Estate of MerkelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  2. Fisk v. SarberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  3. Chorpenning's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  4. Bruner v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. MacDougall v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Highland v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Wolfe v. Lewisburg Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Huff's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Beck v. BeiterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Strickler's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API