Legal Opinion

Leahey v. O'Connor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1924No. Appeal, 104PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

The court below dismissed a bill in equity and a cross-bill, hereinafter more fully described, and the plaintiff in the latter has appealed.

The original bill was filed by R. Edgar Leahey, claiming to be “trustee and attorney-in-fact for Margaret B. O’Connor [hereinafter called the defendant], under a certain [written] agreement.” The bill recited that Francis J. O’Connor died August 13,1920, testate; that, after sundry bequests, he devised the residue of his estate to his widow, the defendant, absolutely and in fee; that, on the day of the execution of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Law v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  2. Richards v. RoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  3. Bigley v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Estate of DanhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Ragan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yarnall EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Havir's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Lawrence v. GodfreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Doyle's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API