Legal Opinion

Mellen Produce Co. v. Fink

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fowler; J.

As appears from the preceding statement of facts, the action is replevin to recover possession of lumber and the appellant's complaint was dismissed. The appellant assigns as error that the court erroneously found that the oral agreement of sale referred to in the statement of facts was made. This finding is amply supported by the evidence. Nothing more will be said relating to this assignment. The appellant also assigns as error that the court erroneously determined that its mortgage referred to in the statement of facts was invalid except as to 5,655 feet of the lumber. This…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eldred v. Oconto Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Urbansky v. KutinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Dolan Mercantile Co. v. MarcusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Stearns v. RaymondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Friedman v. PlousWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerner v. VasbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Holtan v. BjornsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Burson v. Whistler's, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API