Legal Opinion

Holtan v. Bjornson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, C. J.

Upon the evidence introduced on the trial the court found:

That in December, 1949, Holtan visited Spring Valley and inquired of Bjornson regarding certain machinery which he was offering for sale, and that he gave Holtan prices on a nailer, a saw, and a planer, and that Holtan later purchased the nailer and the saw. That Holtan located Julius Erickson at Blair, Wisconsin, who was interested in buying a planer if he could trade lumber for it. That on January 5, 1950, Holtan took Erickson to Spring Valley to show him Bjorn-son’s planer and induced Erickson to buy it; and Holton also had in mind…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stanley v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Third National Bank v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Langley v. SanbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State v. MaasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State Ex Rel. Harris v. Kindy Optical Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pittman v. LieffringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. National Steel Service Center, Inc. v. Wollin Silos & Equipment, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Padgham v. Wilson Music Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API