Friedman v. Plous
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeat, from a judgment of the circuit court for Racine-county: E. B. BeldeN, Circuit Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtTimliN, J.
The plaintiffs, Max Friedman and Ludwig Exel; copartners, sought to recover from tbe defendants, Morris Pious and Louis Pious, copartners, damages for breach of contract of sale by the plaintiff firm to the defendant, firm for $800 of a leasehold interest, machinery, tools, equipment, appliances, material, bills receivable, accounts outstanding, work -in process of completion, names and addresses-of customers, and all other property of every kind and description located at a designated place in Racine, together-with a truck automobile. By special verdict the jury found (1) that an agreement…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- J. H. Silkman Lumber Co. v. HunholzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith v. BouckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Spear v. BachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fredenburg v. HornOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Chicago Metal Refining Co. v. Jerome Trading Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920
- Holtan v. BjornsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Mellen Produce Co. v. FinkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Kibbey v. KinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.