Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Plous

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeat, from a judgment of the circuit court for Racine-county: E. B. BeldeN, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTimliN, J.

The plaintiffs, Max Friedman and Ludwig Exel; copartners, sought to recover from tbe defendants, Morris Pious and Louis Pious, copartners, damages for breach of contract of sale by the plaintiff firm to the defendant, firm for $800 of a leasehold interest, machinery, tools, equipment, appliances, material, bills receivable, accounts outstanding, work -in process of completion, names and addresses-of customers, and all other property of every kind and description located at a designated place in Racine, together-with a truck automobile. By special verdict the jury found (1) that an agreement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J. H. Silkman Lumber Co. v. HunholzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Smith v. BouckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Spear v. BachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fredenburg v. HornOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Chicago Metal Refining Co. v. Jerome Trading Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  3. Holtan v. BjornsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Mellen Produce Co. v. FinkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Kibbey v. KinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API