Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Porter
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 30, 1981No. Nos. 79-2653, 79-2684 and 79-2685PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM,
announcing the judgment of the court:
To the extent the injunction of the district court is directed to the members of the Borough Council it will be reversed. In all other respects the judgment of the district court will be affirmed. Because neither appended opinion commands in its entirety a majority of the members of the court, their positions are noted as follows:
Judges Higginbotham and Sloviter join in Judge Gibbons’ opinion in its entirety.
Chief Judge Seitz, and Judge Adams, because of the unusual factual situation present here, join in the conclusions…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stoneking v. Bradford Area School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Metzger v. OsbeckCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Kathleen Stoneking v. Bradford Area School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Metzger ex rel. Metzger v. OsbeckCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.