Legal Opinion

Land Resources Development v. Kaiser Aetna

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1984No. 12336PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent and cross-appellant, Kaiser Aetna (Kaiser), was a general partnership engaged in the business of buying, selling and developing real property. Kaiser owned eighty-four approved condominium lots in a Lake Tahoe area subdivision known as Pinewild. At some time in 1976, the partners of Kaiser decided to dissolve the partnership and liquidate their assets. Consequently, a number of land developers were informed that the eighty-four Pinewild lots owned by Kaiser were for sale.

Several parties expressed an interest in purchasing the Pine-wild property. Appellant, Land Resources…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. F/V AMERICAN EAGLE v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Driscoll v. ErreguibleNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Truckee-Carson Irrigation District v. WyattNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Brown v. HermanWashington Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. K-Mart Corporation v. WashingtonNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sawyer v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Desert Cab Inc. v. MarinoNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Holderer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Larson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API