Susan Scheerer v. State of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRAMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner Susan Scheerer challenges the respondent judge’s order granting the state’s appeal and remanding her ease to Pima County’s Consolidated Justice Court for resentencing. We accept jurisdiction because Scheerer has no equally plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal. See State ex rel. McDougall v. Riddel, 169 Ariz. 117, 117, 817 P.2d 62, 62 (App.1991) (special action “only avenue remaining for review” of superior court’s decision on appeal from court of limited jurisdiction), citing A.R.S. § 22-375(B) and Ariz. R.P. Spec. Actions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WelchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. Vargas-BurgosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Litak v. ScottArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MarcumOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. PiggOhio Court of Appeals · 2026