Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1969No. 1946PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, justice.

Tom Johnson, hereinafter referred to as Defendant, appeals from an order of the Superior Court of Maricopa County denying his Motion for an Order Nunc Pro Tunc to amend his sentence. He contends that the trial court should have given him credit for the time he served under the previous sentence for the same offense.

Defendant was found guilty of two (2) counts of the illegal sale of marijuana and sentenced as follows:

“It is the judgment and sentence of the court that the defendant on count one is sentenced to serve a term of not less than 12 nor more than 15 years in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. OrtizArizona Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. TritleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. State v. MadridCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. State v. FragozoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. State v. WietholterArizona Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API