Legal Opinion
State v. Welch
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 17, 2000No. 1 CA-CR 99-0324PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 Robert Leroy Welch appeals from his convictions and sentences for manufacturing methamphetamine, possession of chemicals and equipment for the purpose of manufacturing methamphetamine, and possession of drug paraphernalia. He argues that his convictions violate the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the state and federal constitutions. We agree in part, and, therefore, we reverse in part and affirm in part.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 On March 7, 1998, law-enforcement agents arrived at a Prescott apartment in response to complaints of strong odors. They were admitted…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Peak v. AcunaArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. TschilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. SiddleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Merlina v. JejnaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.