Legal Opinion
Woodbury v. Bruckner
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 2001No. 113709, COA No. 204411PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
629 N.W.2d 401 (2001)
464 Mich. 875
Ruth WOODBURY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles I. BRUCKNER and Alice C. Bruckner, Defendants-Appellants.
Docket No. 113709, COA No. 204411.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
July 5, 2001.
As Amended July 10, 2001.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal having been granted, and the case having been argued and submitted, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to that court for reconsideration in light of our decision in Lugo v. Ameritech, Mich. 512, 629 N.W.2d 384 (2001). On reconsideration, the Court of Appeals shall…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. ThornMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Wallington v. CarryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Premera Blue Cross v. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Kyser v. Kasson TwpMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Westlake Transportation, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- In re Parole of HillMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.