Legal Opinion · Dissent

Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. Anderson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1995No. S043578Published

1DissentKennard, J.

J.I dissent.

At issue in this case is the enforceabililty of a subdivision’s land-use restrictions that are set forth in a “declaration” recorded by the subdivider of the land. The majority holds that the restrictions are enforceable against future land purchasers even though the subdivider transferred the lots by means of grant deeds that on their face conveyed a fee simple estate and made no reference to any restriction on the land conveyed. The majority’s rule is a simple one, but simplicity is its only virtue. By adopting this rule, the majority blasts a gaping hole through the structure…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API