A.H. Belo Corp. v. Mesa Police Department
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
¶ 1 A taped 911 call regarding an injured child is the subject of this public records dispute. We consider whether, in light of the privacy interests of the child and his family, the City of Mesa has adequately satisfied its public records disclosure obligation by providing a transcript of the call to KTVK-TV,1 or whether, as the station claims and the trial court determined, Mesa must provide a copy of the audiotape.
Background
¶ 2 On February 29, 2000, Nancy Walsh, a babysitter, called a 911 operator to report that Dominic D., then sixteen months old, had fallen from his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Carlson v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 v. KPNX Broadcasting Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Cox Arizona Publications v. CollinsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Asbury Park Press v. Ocean County Prosecutor's OfficeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Jarron Smith v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
- A.H. Belo Corp. v. Mesa Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Matthew Abraham ph.D. v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.