Judicial Watch, Inc. v. City of Phoenix
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Judicial Watch, Inc. appeals the superi- or court’s denial of special action relief after the City of Phoenix refused to produce activity logs created by the Phoenix Police Department detail assigned to protect Phil Gordon, Mayor of Phoenix. The City cross-appeals the court’s ruling that the Mayor’s privacy interest in the worksheets did not overcome the presumption favoring inspection. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment to the extent it decides that on this record, the City failed to demonstrate that the Mayor’s privacy interest outweighs…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Times Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Mathews v. PyleArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. CanezArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Carlson v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 v. KPNX Broadcasting Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Arizona Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Beau Hodai v. the City of Tucson and Tucson Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- McKee v. Peoria Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Lunney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- JUDICIAL WATCH INC v. KRISTEN MAYESCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.