Legal Opinion
Riedt v. Platt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 20, 1924No. Nos. 13359 and 13360Published
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAY, C.
The two cases, involving the same question of law, have, by agreement of the parties, been consolidated. In No. 13359, the demurrer was sustained to the second amended petition, and in No. 13360 the court directed a verdict' for the defendants. The action of the trial court in each ease was based on the ground that the contract sued on was void, as against public policy, and that is the only queitson presented here. The contract sued on is as follows:
“Agreement.
“This instrument made and entered into this 16th day of February, 1917, by and between G. A. Riedt of Hartshorne,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McGuffin v. Coyle and GussSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Davis v. Board of Com'rs of Choctaw CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Hare v. PhaupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Davis v. JanewaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Enid Right of Way & Townsite Co. v. LileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.