Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Putnam

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1959No. Civ. 23692PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

Appellant, as executrix, bases her appeal upon the failure of the superior court to make a determination, pursuant to her petition for instructions, that property inventoried in the estate was community property.

In her petition filed June 9, 1958, appellant alleged that the decedent died on April 16, 1957, and that she was appointed executrix on November 14, 1957. She further alleged that at the time of the death the decedent and the petitioner were husband and wife and owned as community property the shares of stock and the real property listed in the inventory and appraisement on file, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Central Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Estate of HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Lissner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christiansen v. ChristiansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Estate of RowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Estate of DentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Norton v. BunnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Southern California First National Bank v. DentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API