Legal Opinion
United States v. Maria Ann Dior, United States of America v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 15, 1982No. 80-1497PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
671 F.2d 351
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Maria Ann DIOR, Defendant-Appellee.
UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF
WASHINGTON, Respondent.
No. 80-1497.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Jan. 8, 1981.
Decided March 15, 1982.
Christine McKenna Moore, Seattle, Wash., argued, for plaintiff-appellant; John C. Merkel, U. S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., on brief.
Irwin Schwartz, Federal Public Defender, Seattle, Wash., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Douglas DecincesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015