Legal Opinion

People v. Aarness

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 16, 2007No. 05SC237PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

I. Introduction

In this appeal, we review and reverse People v. Aarness, 116 P.3d 1283 (Colo.App.2005), in which the court of appeals held that the trial court erroneously denied defendant Joshua M. Aarness's motion to suppress evidence. While we agree with the court of appeals' application of the two-pronged standard articulated in Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 68 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980), which determines when police may enter a home seeking to arrest the subject of an arrest warrant, we hold that the existence of exigent circumstances constitutes an independent basis…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Harold B. Dorman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Moody v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Joshua M. AARNESSSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. People v. VondraColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. People v. OramColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. People v. WilliamsColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API