Legal Opinion
People v. Vondra
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 13, 2010No. 09CA1007PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge LOEB.
Defendant, Michael Joseph Vondra, appeals the district court's order denying his Crim. P. 85 motion. We affirm.
I. Background
Defendant pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute between 450 and 1000 grams of a schedule II controlled substance-second offense. Before sentencing, defendant moved to withdraw his plea pursuant to Crim. P. 82(d), claiming his plea was not knowing, voluntary, or intelligent because his plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Specifically, he claimed counsel (1) did not spend enough time with him disceuss-ing the facts of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Ardolino v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- People v. EppensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. FinneyColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Wood v. MilyardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- People v. WilsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. Gutierrez-RuizColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- in Interest of T.BColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.