Legal Opinion

People v. Oram

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 2009No. 07CA0023PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

Defendant, Jason Richard Oram, appeals the judgment of conviction entered upon jury verdicts finding him guilty of second degree burglary and felony menacing. He contends his burglary conviction should be reversed based on his reliance on the common law bonding agent's privilege. We conclude there is a common law bonding agent's privilege in Colorado, but that it did not justify Oram's entry into the home at issue. Accordingly, we affirm.

I. Background

Oram and his codefendant, Devon Scott Weinstein, were "bounty hunters" or bond recovery agents (collectively agents).…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Accarino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  4. People v. MoodySupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Leonardo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Riley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. People v. CarterColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. People v. DouglasColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. People v. BondurantColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. People v. WaldenColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API