UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Osvaldo CONTRERAS-CONTRERAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether a prosecutor’s volunteered reason for exercising a peremp tory challenge against an African-American enables a defendant to preserve the issue for appeal, notwithstanding the defense attorney’s failure to object during voir dire or trial.
I
Osvaldo Contreras-Contreras, a citizen of Mexico, appeals his conviction for reentering the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2).
Contreras-Contreras’ claim arises under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). To prevail on a Batson claim, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Shawn JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Rodriguez v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Addison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Haney v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.