Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Osvaldo CONTRERAS-CONTRERAS, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1996No. 95-50010PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether a prosecutor’s volunteered reason for exercising a peremp tory challenge against an African-American enables a defendant to preserve the issue for appeal, notwithstanding the defense attorney’s failure to object during voir dire or trial.

I

Osvaldo Contreras-Contreras, a citizen of Mexico, appeals his conviction for reentering the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2).

Contreras-Contreras’ claim arises under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). To prevail on a Batson claim, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Shawn JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Rodriguez v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Addison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Haney v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API