Legal Opinion

Haney v. Adams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 2011No. 09-16148PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

In Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 89, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), the Supreme Court held that “the Equal Protection Clause forbids the prosecutor to challenge potential jurors solely on account of their race or on the assumption that black jurors as a group will be unable impartially to consider the State’s case against a black defendant.” We now hold that a petitioner may not raise a Batson claim in his habeas petition if the petitioner failed to object to the prosecution’s use of peremptory challenges at trial. We must, therefore, affirm the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Timothy Robert Ronk v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Knowles v. MunizDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
  3. Griffin v. HarringtonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
  4. Tomas Rodriguez Infante v. Michael MartelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. (HC) Relmon H. Davis III v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API