Legal Opinion

State v. Hitt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 10, 2001No. 219806978; A104911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm. ORS 166.250(1)(b) (1997). He challenges the accusatory instrument on the ground that it failed to state a crime. ORS 135.630(4). He also assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop. We affirm.

We accept the facts as found by the trial court if they are supported by evidence; if the trial court did not make findings concerning facts which were in dispute, “we will presume that the facts were decided in a manner consistent with the ultimate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. AmayaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Thompson v. CoughlinOregon Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API